Self-lay competition case raises 'big issues', says Ofwat
Ofwat has announced its final decision to accept binding commitments from Bristol Water under the Competition Act 1998 on new water connections in a case that the regulator said "raises issues of strategic significance for the sector".
in response to two separate complaints, Ofwat launched a formal investigation in March 2013 into the price and non-price terms Bristol Water applied when providing services to self-lay organisations. These related to the services provided by Bristol Water to enable the provision of water connections for new development sites, either by itself or by self-lay organisations (SLOs).
Last summer Ofwat consulted on its intention to accept binding commitments from Bristol Water, which had offered to make changes to both its structure and processes in response to the specific competition concerns identified by the regulator. This included a clearer separation of Bristol Water’s downstream developer services functions, which operate in a contestable market, from its non-contestable upstream services.
Ofwat has decided that the commitments offered by Bristol Water address the competition concerns identified, and these will now be binding and enforceable under the Competition Act. This decision means Ofwat has now closed the investigation with no decision made on whether or not Bristol Water infringed the Competition Act.
The regulator said the case raises issues of strategic significance for the sector, given that the market for new water connections is currently one of only a few areas of competition in the water and sewerage sector. The level playing field and competition law compliance issues the case raises are relevant to the sector as a whole.
Richard Khaldi, senior director, Customers and Casework at Ofwat, said: “Our decision addresses the specific concerns referred to us by two of Bristol’s SLO customers. These commitments will help ensure an effective and fair market, which is good news for customers and the local economy.
“It also raises big issues for the whole sector. All companies need to understand who the customers of each of their services are, and to make sure they are meeting their obligations to ensure a fair, effective market. This can be a particular issue when a company is delivering both contestable and non-contestable services alongside each other. It will also become even more relevant as competition increases as a result of the Water Act 2014.”
- Procurement competition for water ADR service Water UK will launch a procurement competition to recruit an established provider of alternative dispute resolution (ADR)... Read More >
- Southern Water servicing contract for Hydro Hydro's wastewater division is to continue servicing and maintaining the Hydro SludgeScreen primary sludge screening and... Read More >
- NI Water's new state-of-the-art Magligan WwTW gets a visit from Kennedy Regional development minister Danny Kennedy has visited the recently completed Magilligan Wastewater Treatment Works... Read More >
- Changing the way water utilities think George Hesmondhalgh, managing consultant at Capgemini, says companies need to stop viewing legislation as an obligation... Read More >
- The price of water As part of our Utility of the Future campaign, Robin Hackett looks at whether low water bills can be maintained long term Read More >
- Scottish Water starts planning for the long term For SR21, Scottish Water is moving away from the traditional approach to business plans and developing a blueprint for the... Read More >
- Football teams and water companies: Closer than you think New season, new league, new challenges... Egremont Group's Owen Quinn and Alex Graham on the parallels between football... Read More >
- Abstract concept: How can water companies reduce abstraction? Despite concerns over supplies, water companies face pressure to reduce abstraction. As part of our Utility of the Future... Read More >