Scientists call for clampdown on antibiotics in the Thames
The amount of antibiotics entering the River Thames would need to be cut by 80 per cent to avoid the spread of antibiotic-resistant “superbugs”, according to a new study.
The study by scientists from the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (CEH) found that across three-quarters of the River Thames catchment, the antibiotics present were likely to be at levels high enough for antibiotic-resistant bacteria to develop.
“Rivers are a ‘reservoir’ for antibiotic-resistant bacteria which can quickly spread to people via water, soil, air, food and animals,’ said Dr Andrew Singer of the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, who led the study.“
Our beaches offer a similar risk. It has been shown that surfers are four times more likely to carry drug-resistant bacteria than non-surfers.”
Up to 90 per cent of prescribed antibiotics taken by people pass through the body and into the sewerage system, where about half end up in rivers when effluent is discharged.
“The release of drugs and bugs into our rivers increases the likelihood of antibiotic-resistant genes being shared, either through mutation or ‘bacterial sex’,” added Dr Singer.
“This is the first step towards the development of superbugs as the drugs used to fight them will no longer work. Environmental pollution from drugs and bugs is a serious problem that we need to find solutions to.”
The CEH-led research was based on prescription data from clinical commissioning groups for two classes of antibiotics – macrolides, such as erythromycin and azithromycin, and fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin.
Macrolides treat a range of respiratory and sexually transmitted infections such as pneumonia, whooping cough and chlamydia, while fluoroquinolones treat respiratory and urinary tract infections.
These were chosen for the study because they biodegrade slowly while other antibiotics such as penicillin biodegrade before they get to the river.
The study also comes after England’s chief medical officer Professor Dame Sally Davies warned last week that bugs resistant to antibiotics could pose a more immediate risk to humanity than climate change, and may kill at least 10 million people a year across the world.
There are a number of different ways we could reduce the amount of antibiotics entering rivers, including reducing inappropriate prescriptions1and the development of new wastewater treatment processes that would remove the drugs and bugs from sewage.
- EA's £300M Thames estuary flood defence deal goes to CH2M Hill The £300M contract for the Thames Estuary Asset Management Programme has been awarded to CH2M Hill by the Environment... Read More >
- Hidden pollution below ground threatens global water supplies Groundwater researchers at the British Geological Survey (BGS) have found a major store of pollution sitting in the rocks... Read More >
- ‘Make or break' time for microbeads ban, say campaigners Water companies and environmental campaigners have joined forces to call for a comprehensive ban on microbeads in consumer... Read More >
- Flushed with success: FOG and Unflushables Southern Water's FOG and Unflushables programme has brought a significant improvement in the state of its sewers. Robin... Read More >
- Will SfA8 make as big a splash as hoped? Martin Lambley, product manager for stormwater management at Wavin, looks at whether Sewers for Adoption 8 will meet... Read More >
- Developing ideas: Thames Water's innovative sewer plan Thames Water is radically re-engineering an Oxfordshire market town's sewer network to help developers prepare for... Read More >
- Brexit, WWII, ancient artefacts: Southern Water's testing sewer project Southern Water's £2.5 million project to replace an 800m stretch of sewer main in Kent was complicated by - among other... Read More >
- Tyre microplastics pollution: Ignore it or remove it? Tyre microplastics is one of the largest sources of pervasive pollution in the water environment, yet consistently ignored... Read More >