Kent dairy farmer prosecuted for polluting stream with slurry
A dairy farmer based near Ashford has been ordered to pay £1,500 plus £5,516 in victim charges and costs by Maidstone Magistrates' Court after being found guilty of discharging slurry into a local watercourse.
The Environment Agency brought the charges against Mr Peter Joules of Bircholt Farm, Bradbourne, Ashford, Kent, after its officers discovered a spill of neat slurry from an overflowing slurry lagoon that reached the stream.
The officers then found that there had been a longer spill of dilute slurry and dirty water from livestock gathering areas that was also polluting the watercourse, via an underground pipe.
In March 2017, Environment Agency officers were inspecting a tributary of the Aylesford Brook when they discovered slurry running into the stream, and traced it back to the slurry lagoon at Bircholt Farm.
They then discovered a black pipe discharging a brown liquid around 200 metres further upstream. The pipe was part of farmyard drainage system that discharged rainwater and yard washings. The pipe allowed diluted slurry, chopped straw, animal feed and soil sediment to enter the stream.
Environment Agency officers took samples from the stream and found the water quality was heavily impacted by the two discharges.
The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) sets limits for what is considered ‘good’ water quality. The WFD levels for biological oxygen demand are 4.0mg/l, yet those found in the sample were 463mg/l – 115 times the limit. For orthophosphate, the level is 0.12mg/l, but the sample returned 15.2 mg/l – 126 times above the limit.
An Environment Agency spokesperson said: "Good farm management is vital to avoid incidents like this that damage the local aquatic environment and harm wildlife.
"We take these incidents very seriously and do everything within our powers to safeguard the environment and people that may be affected. Mr Joules’ farm didn’t have the infrastructure to deal with the slurry it produces, which caused a serious pollution incident. In these circumstances we do not hesitate to prosecute."
- United Utilities fined £666K for polluting river with raw sewage United Utilities (UU) has been ordered to pay a fine of £666,000 after pleading guilty to polluting a river with untreated... Read More >
- BAM Nuttall wins £23M Hull flood defence deal Leading construction and engineering company BAM Nuttall has been awarded a £23M contract for a major flood defence scheme... Read More >
- Reedbeds could be answer to River Lee pollution The creation of reedbeds along the River Lee could be a low-cost and attractive solution to the river's significant... Read More >
- Data Protection and Brexit - Is your organisation prepared? Guidance to help businesses and charities continue to comply with data protection law after the UK leaves the EU Read More >
- Ofwat's assessments keep water companies in check The regulator's initial assessment of water companies' business plans reveals that a tight financial settlement is on the... Read More >
- Opinion: How will the UK protect the environment after Brexit? The Draft Environment (Principles & Governance) Bill leaves several unanswered questions about the enforcement of the... Read More >
- Ofwat's PR19 assessments: How the industry reacted After Ofwat published its initial assessments of water companies' business plans for 2020-25, we look at the responses... Read More >
- Preparing for better phosphorus removal in AMP7 In order to meet the more stringent phosphorus removal requirements expected in 2020- 25, wastewater utilities will need to... Read More >