Kent dairy farmer prosecuted for polluting stream with slurry
A dairy farmer based near Ashford has been ordered to pay £1,500 plus £5,516 in victim charges and costs by Maidstone Magistrates' Court after being found guilty of discharging slurry into a local watercourse.
- Capital's infrastructure needs integrated water approach
- Energy and utilities CEOs launch sector inclusion commitment
- Thames helps develop new mental health first aid guidance
- Yorkshire Water starts smart analytics trial to help battle leakage
- Six water companies back sanitary disposal bag initiative
The Environment Agency brought the charges against Mr Peter Joules of Bircholt Farm, Bradbourne, Ashford, Kent, after its officers discovered a spill of neat slurry from an overflowing slurry lagoon that reached the stream.
The officers then found that there had been a longer spill of dilute slurry and dirty water from livestock gathering areas that was also polluting the watercourse, via an underground pipe.
In March 2017, Environment Agency officers were inspecting a tributary of the Aylesford Brook when they discovered slurry running into the stream, and traced it back to the slurry lagoon at Bircholt Farm.
They then discovered a black pipe discharging a brown liquid around 200 metres further upstream. The pipe was part of farmyard drainage system that discharged rainwater and yard washings. The pipe allowed diluted slurry, chopped straw, animal feed and soil sediment to enter the stream.
Environment Agency officers took samples from the stream and found the water quality was heavily impacted by the two discharges.
The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) sets limits for what is considered ‘good’ water quality. The WFD levels for biological oxygen demand are 4.0mg/l, yet those found in the sample were 463mg/l – 115 times the limit. For orthophosphate, the level is 0.12mg/l, but the sample returned 15.2 mg/l – 126 times above the limit.
An Environment Agency spokesperson said: "Good farm management is vital to avoid incidents like this that damage the local aquatic environment and harm wildlife.
"We take these incidents very seriously and do everything within our powers to safeguard the environment and people that may be affected. Mr Joules’ farm didn’t have the infrastructure to deal with the slurry it produces, which caused a serious pollution incident. In these circumstances we do not hesitate to prosecute."
- Outdoor use of metaldehyde banned from spring 2020 A ban on the outdoor use of metaldehyde is to be introduced across Great Britain from spring 2020, the Environment... Read More >
- Stop fracking in Wales, says Friends of the Earth Dwr Cymru Welsh Water (DCWW) said it will assess any application to undertake fracking within its supply area on a... Read More >
- Thames Water ordered to pay more compensation to sewer flooding victims Thames Water has lost an appeal to pay a smaller fine and less compensation to victims of sewer flooding. Instead, the... Read More >
- Opinion: How will the UK protect the environment after Brexit? The Draft Environment (Principles & Governance) Bill leaves several unanswered questions about the enforcement of the... Read More >
- Ofwat's PR19 assessments: How the industry reacted After Ofwat published its initial assessments of water companies' business plans for 2020-25, we look at the responses... Read More >
- Preparing for better phosphorus removal in AMP7 In order to meet the more stringent phosphorus removal requirements expected in 2020- 25, wastewater utilities will need to... Read More >
- Customers, Innovation, Sprinting and The Gruffalo A design sprint on customer service at WWT's recent Water Industry Technology Innovation Conference highlighted how the... Read More >
- Ready for anything: Resilience in the Round Resilience is one of the four priorities that Ofwat wants to see water companies adopt in their plans for PR19. But what... Read More >