Government challenged to review Thames 'super sewer' decision
Thamesbank and the Environmental Law Foundation (ELF) urge government to review decision on the Thames Tideway Tunnel, saying there are "now powerful new circumstances that merit re-consideration".
The two organisations, supported by several groups as well as former Ofwat director general Sir Ian Byatt, has written to the three secretaries of state at Defra, Energy & Climate Change and Communities and Local Government outlining grounds for the review. They said the relevant circumstances for the review are:
- Mounting concerns about the cost and financing of the TTT
- Changed policy landscape supporting cheaper and more effective alternative approaches
- New practical evidence of the success of cheaper and more effective alternative approaches
- Clear case that the terms of reference and scope specified for the assessment of alternatives in 2010 was inadequate
- Clear case that the assumption on which the benefit of the project was assessed was flawed
New evidence has been submitted in the letter. This includes two tunnel engineers who have each questioned the reliability of evidence used by Thames Water. The engineers were involved with the original studies that looked into the feasibility of the tunnel, which was conceived by the Thames Tideway Strategic Study Group (TTSS) between 2000 and 2005,
In requesting the review, Thamesbank and ELF and the co-signatories said they believe the government "is in grave danger of drifting" into a solution to a problem which has been misunderstood.
Thamesbank and ELF said they "strongly believed" there alternative solutions would be cheaper and more effective in quickly cleaning the Thames as well as come with wider benefits. They said the National Policy Statement on Waste Water (NPS), published in March 2012, "is both wrong and unlawful in circumstances where alternatives have never adequately been investigated".
The letter concludes that the government now has an "opportunity to reopen the consultation through the Aarhus Convention and transform London positively for generations to come".
Click here for the letter in full
- Ofwat publishes performance reporting framework Ofwat has set out a framework for how it wants water companies to report performance and financial information to their... Read More >
- Research suggests privatising water industry has cost consumers billions Privatised water has cost consumers £2.3bn more a year than it would have if it had remained state-owned, research from... Read More >
- National Drought Group outlines action plan amid heatwave The National Drought Group (NDG) has outlined its plans for the coming weeks amid the continued hot and dry weather. Read More >
- Getting to the heart of sewer repair Wessex Water's award-winning Re-Rounder, inspired by heart surgery techniques, helps get deformed sewer networks back into... Read More >
- Through the keyhole: The King's Scholars' Pond project The use of keyhole engineering on Thames Water's King's Scholars' Pond project saved money and carbon while keeping London... Read More >
- Flushed with success: FOG and Unflushables Southern Water's FOG and Unflushables programme has brought a significant improvement in the state of its sewers. Robin... Read More >
- Will SfA8 make as big a splash as hoped? Martin Lambley, product manager for stormwater management at Wavin, looks at whether Sewers for Adoption 8 will meet... Read More >
- Developing ideas: Thames Water's innovative sewer plan Thames Water is radically re-engineering an Oxfordshire market town's sewer network to help developers prepare for... Read More >