CMA sets out further steps in water tank cartel case
The Competition and Markets Authority has presented further details of its case against five galvanised steel tank suppliers which have been accused of operating a cartel in breach of competition law.
The firms are suppliers of tanks used for water storage in larger buildings, such as schools, hospitals and other commercial and public premises, and supply the water used in fire sprinkler systems.
Previously, in a settlement announced in March 2016, three of the five suppliers - Franklin Hodge Industries Ltd, Galglass Ltd and KW Supplies Ltd (formerly Kondea Water Supplies Ltd) - admitted to having agreed with each other, and with a fourth supplier, CST Industries (UK) Ltd, to share the market between them, to fix prices and to rig bids for contracts between 2005 and 2012. The aim of these actions was to improve profit margins on the tanks by avoiding customers being able to ‘play’ the competitors off against each other. These companies have agreed to pay fines totalling more than £2.6 million.
CST Industries (UK) Ltd, which brought these arrangements to the authorities’ attention, will as a result benefit from immunity from fines, provided that it continues to co-operate with the CMA.
In a separate allegation, the CMA has also provisionally concluded that some of the suppliers exchanged competitively-sensitive pricing information at (or shortly after) a meeting in July 2012. This involved three of the suppliers involved in the main cartel arrangement who have already admitted the conduct (Franklin Hodge Industries Ltd, Galglass Ltd and KW Supplies Ltd), plus another supplier, Balmoral Tanks Ltd.
A new case decision group will now hear representations on this information exchange allegation from Balmoral Tanks, which has neither settled nor admitted any wrongdoing. The CMA said that no conclusion should be drawn that Balmoral has infringed competition law pending the outcome of that process.
Stephen Blake, Senior Director of the CMA’s Cartels and Criminal Group, said: “Strong competition between businesses has clear benefits for customers, who benefit from lower prices, better quality and more choice. Any weakening of competition that maintains or increases prices will ultimately be at the expense of consumers or tax payers.
“In March, we announced a settlement with the participants in the main cartel and the issue of today’s statement represents the next stage in the process.”
- Barriers to innovation revealed in WWT survey A lack of infrastructure to fast-track ideas from inception to implementation is seen as the most significant barrier to... Read More >
- New CEO appointed at Water UK Christine McGourty has been appointed as Water UK's new chief executive. Read More >
- Regulators must be given powers to tackle climate change The UK will fail to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 if regulators aren't given new powers to ensure... Read More >
- A glass half-full? Bringing water costs down for utility customers Mark Bullock, Balfour Beatty chief executive officer for rail and utilities, says the water sector must change its... Read More >
- INWED 2019: 'Each step was driven by choosing work I enjoy' To mark International Women in Engineering Day 2019 on 23 June, Fiona Barbour discusses her journey to becoming Mott... Read More >
- Interview: Kier Utilities' water MD Nigel Dyer Kier Utilities' Nigel Dyer tells Robin Hackett how the company is evolving to meet the changing demands on the water... Read More >
- Comment: New tech and partnerships will up the ante on leakage Closer partnerships, technology and connectivity will be the key to tackling leakage, with collaborative delivery... Read More >
- The search for safer streetworks practices Amey Utilities' HSEQ director, Gerry Mulholland, explains how the company’s 2020 Challenge and Know What’s Below... Read More >