British Water members not keen on water nationalisation
Companies across the water supply chain believe that the Labour Party's plan to nationalise English water companies would negatively impact their businesses as well as customers, according to a survey by British Water.
On overall impact on the supply chain, 78% of the British Water members surveyed said they believed future investment would be reduced or significantly reduced, while 14% believed it would increase. Sixty-four per cent said they believed the number of people employed in the supply chain would be reduced.
A similar number, 66%, believe that standards of service would be reduced or significantly reduced, but only 39% believe that water quality at the tap would be reduced. Some 40% of British Water’s 200+ member companies responded, with some 55% saying they believed their business’ turnover and profitability would be reduced or significantly reduced.
One respondent said: “I think there would be a lack of investment followed by a deterioration in assets and environmental performance. I think that drinking water standards would be maintained by hook or by crook.” Another said it would be useful to consider other models such as not-for-profit DÅµr Cymru Welsh Water.
Shadow chancellor of the exchequer, John McDonnell unveiled the Labour Party’s intention to bring the UK’s privatised water companies in England and Wales back into public ownership in a conference speech in September 2018. He said that the renationalised industry would be run by local councils, workers and customers under a new ownership model.
British Water UK director Paul Mullord said: “Changes in the ownership structure of the water industry would inevitably have an impact on British Water members. The risk coming from renationalisation is that levels of investment would fall, reducing opportunities for the supply chain, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, and potentially impacting on levels of service for customers.
“While less than 40% believe water quality into people’s homes would be affected, a majority of our members have expressed concern about the impact on their businesses, jobs and levels of investment.”
Of the 40% of British Water member companies that responded, 37% were consultants, 30% were contractors, 29% were manufacturers and suppliers, and 4% were water utilities.
- Anglian Water selects six partners for £1.3B AMP6 programme Balfour Beatty, Barhale, Grontmij, MMB (the joint venture between Mott MacDonald and JN Bentley), MWH and Skanska are the... Read More >
- British Water focus group to explore data and analytics British Water has founded a new focus group focusing on data and analytics, which will outline best practice in this... Read More >
- Northumbrian Water tops supplier satisfaction list Northumbrian Water has been voted the top UK water company for supplier satisfaction in a supply chain survey conducted by... Read More >
- The price of water As part of our Utility of the Future campaign, Robin Hackett looks at whether low water bills can be maintained long term Read More >
- Scottish Water starts planning for the long term For SR21, Scottish Water is moving away from the traditional approach to business plans and developing a blueprint for the... Read More >
- Football teams and water companies: Closer than you think New season, new league, new challenges... Egremont Group's Owen Quinn and Alex Graham on the parallels between football... Read More >
- Abstract concept: How can water companies reduce abstraction? Despite concerns over supplies, water companies face pressure to reduce abstraction. As part of our Utility of the Future... Read More >
- The end of 'business as usual' in the water sector? James Connolly, head of partnerships at digital asset and works management company eviFile, assesses the message coming... Read More >