Expert View: Phosphorus removal made simple
With the water industry seeking efficient ways to remove phosphorus (P), the C-TECH biological process is one solution that can offer effective treatment with a compact plant footprint, Trant Engineering process engineer Ben Hazard writes
What’s the problem?
Biological phosphorus removal is the phrase on everyone’s lips in the UK water industry at the moment, and achieving Bio-P removal with a low site footprint is the goal.
Phosphorus and other nutrients that enter watercourses through wastewater effluent discharge cause eutrophication in sensitive areas, which drastically harms aquatic life. Therefore there are limits put into place for these sensitive areas on the concentration of nutrients that water companies are allowed to discharge – for phosphorus this currently stands at 2 mg/l for small sites and 1 mg/l for large sites, but this is expected to tighten to 0.1 mg/l in the coming AMP period.
The number of sensitive areas is also expected to increase and both these factors highlight the need for water companies to invest in nutrient removal treatment processes to ensure they remain compliant in the years to come. A scarcity of available land for construction and financial constraints from Ofwat also calls for low footprint and low Totex solutions to be implemented for nutrient removal.
What’s the solution?
Bio-P removal is typically achieved by creating the perfect conditions for the growth of polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) within activated sludge processes (ASP). These PAOs uptake phosphorus when aerated and are then removed from the treated effluent during sludge removal.
The latest iteration of the C-TECH cyclic activated sludge process from SFC Umwelttechnik and delivered by Trant Engineering provides the perfect conditions for the growth of PAOs and therefore biological phosphorus removal, with treated effluent concentrations of < 1 mg/l.
The C-TECH process is fundamentally an adaption of the sequencing batch reactor (SBR) process, whereby secondary biological treatment and tertiary settling are combined in a single basin. However, with the C-TECH, two or more batch basins are installed in parallel with their sequences out of phase with each other allowing for a continuous flow through the system. As a result, no upstream buffer tank is required, unlike traditional SBR systems. Such a process is known as a cyclic activated sludge process.
The phases of the C-TECH process are: fill/aerate, settle and decant. Within these three phases, COD/BOD5, total nitrogen, bio-P and solids removal all happen within a single tank with no mechanical mixing equipment or complex valving arrangements necessary. This really highlights the operation simplicity of the process and by eliminating the need for primary and tertiary settling tanks, buffer tanks and anoxic zones, the overall site footprint reduction becomes clear.
As well as phosphorus removal, the C-TECH design allows for the formation of so-called macroflocs. The enhanced size of these macroflocs means that each floc contains an external aerobic zone and an internal anoxic/anaerobic zone even during the aeration phase of the C-TECH process cycle. This means that nitrification and denitrification occur simultaneously within the same reactor zone and cycle phase, therefore reducing the required reactor volume/overall cycle time when compared to traditional AS or SBR processes.
The Grossarl plant in Austria gives a good indication of what the latest C-TECH design can achieve in UK conditions. The 18,000 PE, 3,440 m3/d (DWF) plant was built in 2004 as an upgrade to an existing two-lane activated sludge plant.
Two new C-TECH lanes were built and brought online either side of the existing lanes, and then the two existing activated sludge lanes were converted into two further C-TECH lanes, creating a four-lane system all whilst keeping the site operational. The total volume of the four reactor basins is 5,200 m3 with a footprint of 1130 m2.
Grossarl’s influent consists of a mixture of domestic and industrial wastewater with typical water quality values shown below. Also shown in the table are the design influent and average effluent qualities for 2014. Even during the coldest month, January, when the water temperature is below 8°C, high levels of biological nutrient and BOD5/COD removal are still achieved.
|Parameter||Design Influent Load (kg/d)||Average Influent Concentration (mg/l)||Average Effluent Concentration (mg/l)||January 2014 Effluent Concentration (mg/l)|
- Slough WWTW no longer running at a snail's pace A modification to the final effluent treatment process enabled Thames Water to solve the problem of snails in the sewage... Read More >
- Comment: A Totex Journey The move to outcomes and Totex-Based Regulation in AMP6 should mean water companies and contractors involving suppliers ... Read More >
- Southern spends £25M to meet NEP conditions Due to the need to cut nitrogen levels in effluent being discharged into the River Test, Southern Water has invested £25M... Read More >
- Interview: Atkins' Daressa Frodsham Atkins' new head of UK water, Daressa Frodsham, tells Robin Hackett that the company has what it takes to tackle the huge... Read More >
- Ready for resilience: Overcoming challenges on the BRP Working collaboratively with Severn Trent Water, independent infrastructure specialist Barhale has overcome some... Read More >
- Managed service web portal pays off for Anglian Water A map-based web portal using GPS positioning has enabled Anglian Water's mobile workforce to better handle its planning... Read More >
- Microbe management: MBBR upgrade at Bolton-upon-Dearne WwTW Galliford Try is installing a tertiary treatment system that is set to result in significant savings for Yorkshire Water Read More >
- Striking it out: How can the industry cut down utility strikes? Utility strikes are both costly and potentially fatal. With tens of thousands believed to occur in the UK every year, how... Read More >