Expert View: Phosphorus removal made simple
With the water industry seeking efficient ways to remove phosphorus (P), the C-TECH biological process is one solution that can offer effective treatment with a compact plant footprint, Trant Engineering process engineer Ben Hazard writes
What’s the problem?
Biological phosphorus removal is the phrase on everyone’s lips in the UK water industry at the moment, and achieving Bio-P removal with a low site footprint is the goal.
Phosphorus and other nutrients that enter watercourses through wastewater effluent discharge cause eutrophication in sensitive areas, which drastically harms aquatic life. Therefore there are limits put into place for these sensitive areas on the concentration of nutrients that water companies are allowed to discharge – for phosphorus this currently stands at 2 mg/l for small sites and 1 mg/l for large sites, but this is expected to tighten to 0.1 mg/l in the coming AMP period.
The number of sensitive areas is also expected to increase and both these factors highlight the need for water companies to invest in nutrient removal treatment processes to ensure they remain compliant in the years to come. A scarcity of available land for construction and financial constraints from Ofwat also calls for low footprint and low Totex solutions to be implemented for nutrient removal.
What’s the solution?
Bio-P removal is typically achieved by creating the perfect conditions for the growth of polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) within activated sludge processes (ASP). These PAOs uptake phosphorus when aerated and are then removed from the treated effluent during sludge removal.
The latest iteration of the C-TECH cyclic activated sludge process from SFC Umwelttechnik and delivered by Trant Engineering provides the perfect conditions for the growth of PAOs and therefore biological phosphorus removal, with treated effluent concentrations of < 1 mg/l.
The C-TECH process is fundamentally an adaption of the sequencing batch reactor (SBR) process, whereby secondary biological treatment and tertiary settling are combined in a single basin. However, with the C-TECH, two or more batch basins are installed in parallel with their sequences out of phase with each other allowing for a continuous flow through the system. As a result, no upstream buffer tank is required, unlike traditional SBR systems. Such a process is known as a cyclic activated sludge process.
The phases of the C-TECH process are: fill/aerate, settle and decant. Within these three phases, COD/BOD5, total nitrogen, bio-P and solids removal all happen within a single tank with no mechanical mixing equipment or complex valving arrangements necessary. This really highlights the operation simplicity of the process and by eliminating the need for primary and tertiary settling tanks, buffer tanks and anoxic zones, the overall site footprint reduction becomes clear.
As well as phosphorus removal, the C-TECH design allows for the formation of so-called macroflocs. The enhanced size of these macroflocs means that each floc contains an external aerobic zone and an internal anoxic/anaerobic zone even during the aeration phase of the C-TECH process cycle. This means that nitrification and denitrification occur simultaneously within the same reactor zone and cycle phase, therefore reducing the required reactor volume/overall cycle time when compared to traditional AS or SBR processes.
The Grossarl plant in Austria gives a good indication of what the latest C-TECH design can achieve in UK conditions. The 18,000 PE, 3,440 m3/d (DWF) plant was built in 2004 as an upgrade to an existing two-lane activated sludge plant.
Two new C-TECH lanes were built and brought online either side of the existing lanes, and then the two existing activated sludge lanes were converted into two further C-TECH lanes, creating a four-lane system all whilst keeping the site operational. The total volume of the four reactor basins is 5,200 m3 with a footprint of 1130 m2.
Grossarl’s influent consists of a mixture of domestic and industrial wastewater with typical water quality values shown below. Also shown in the table are the design influent and average effluent qualities for 2014. Even during the coldest month, January, when the water temperature is below 8°C, high levels of biological nutrient and BOD5/COD removal are still achieved.
|Parameter||Design Influent Load (kg/d)||Average Influent Concentration (mg/l)||Average Effluent Concentration (mg/l)||January 2014 Effluent Concentration (mg/l)|
- Disappointment replaces AMP6 optimism The first year of AMP6 is complete but has the regulatory cycle lived up to expectations of renewed vigour, or has it been... Read More >
- Two plants on a small site - the Millbrook challenge Southern Water's Millbrook wastewater treatment works upgrade, like so many in the UK, is an upgrade of an old existing... Read More >
- In Depth: Pumping and Energy Whether it is impeller design, motor specification or the timing of maintenance and replacement, much can be done to make... Read More >
- INWED 2019: 'Each step was driven by choosing work I enjoy' To mark International Women in Engineering Day 2019 on 23 June, Fiona Barbour discusses her journey to becoming Mott... Read More >
- Interview: Kier Utilities' water MD Nigel Dyer Kier Utilities' Nigel Dyer tells Robin Hackett how the company is evolving to meet the changing demands on the water... Read More >
- Comment: New tech and partnerships will up the ante on leakage Closer partnerships, technology and connectivity will be the key to tackling leakage, with collaborative delivery... Read More >
- The search for safer streetworks practices Amey Utilities' HSEQ director, Gerry Mulholland, explains how the company’s 2020 Challenge and Know What’s Below... Read More >
- In Focus: Health, safety and wellbeing at Lanes Group Having introduced an array of creative solutions to improve health, safety and wellbeing, Lanes Group is showing the... Read More >