Comment: Sustainable ways to prevent flooding
With traditional methods of removing floodwater no longer fit for purpose, it's time to find out whether sustainable solutions can make real headway in the industry, writes Jeremy Jones
by Jeremy Jones, Associate Director, Atkins
With the disruption that the storms left over the winter period, it provokes the question – are we doing enough to prevent flooding and tackling it at source? During the height of the storms, we had 103 flood alerts in place; a high of 2 inches of rain in Exeter; and flooded properties and roads in Devon. And our weather conditions are showing no sign of changing. Rainfall has increased across all regions of the UK over the last 50 years – winters are wetter and even with drier summers, rainfall is becoming concentrated into more intensive downpours (up 5% in the last 20 years).
Traditional methods of removing rainwater – i.e. removing it as quickly as possible from our roads and pavements through the network and out to sea – are not always fit for purpose during periods of severe rainfall. Climate change, urban creep and new developments have together meant that the infrastructure is no longer adequate. So after each period of heavy rain as technical experts we continue to bang the drum that more preventative action should be taken instead of last minute urgent care.
Attention then has to turn to Storm Water Management (SWM) and sustainable urban drainage systems (SuDS). SuDS mimic natural processes enabling natural drainage around buildings and other developments which work by slowly draining, or sometimes holding in surplus water caused by rain and surface water. We are now seeing SuDS not only employed in new developments but also as a retrofit opportunity for water companies, with many water companies now grasping the opportunity and developing processes, governance procedures and implementing new measures for SWM.
At Atkins we are advisors to the majority of UK water companies. In addition to assisting them with new ways of working for SWM, we have created the SuDS Studio toolkit which is a unique geospatial tool that brings together our experience in planning and engineering with cutting edge geospatial modelling capabilities. It works by rapidly mapping out potential areas which could benefit from the implementation of SuDS. As a rapid scanning tool, it is a much more cost effective tool than the traditional approach of assessing each area individually. It also prioritises the opportunities for SuDS, which is extremely helpful to the end user.
As experts working with SuDS on a daily basis, we continue to praise the benefits. SuDS can typically cost less than half of what traditional drainage systems cost, and they can cost much less than retrospective flood defences (even though these will remain an essential part of the flooding protection mix). They also have a range of benefits – not only do they remove large amounts of surface water from entering into the sewer network and watercourses (preventing overloading, and reducing flooding), they also encourage ground water recharge; reduce pollutant concentration; and provide habitats for wildlife. And they also can really improve the aesthetics of an area – the introduction of plants, wild flowers and trees can do much to improve heavily urbanised areas.
Whilst it is reassuring that a number of water companies are beginning to realise the benefits of SWM and SuDS, we are a long way from it being recognised as a mainstream tool to reduce the risk of flooding. The positivity around the 2012 Flood and Water Management Act which sought to enshrine SuDS has now levelled off – 4 years on and there is still no official approval body that has oversight of SuDS schemes.
That said, whilst we may have another battering of flooding this year, and subsequently resort to our traditional methods of dealing with the damages, I am hopeful of an uptake of more SuDS schemes. Some water companies are getting behind the SuDS agenda and that’s a good start at least. We’re also seeing a raft of changes in local authorities. Planners are coming on board and there is a greater desire to collaborate with others. This, I hope, will lead to integrated social solutions that generations to come will be proud of.
-This is a version of an article that first appeared on Atkins 'Angles' thought leadership blog. More insight and opinion from Atkins experts is available here.
- Decarbonising the UK water industry - how low can it go? Reducing carbon in the water industry may need more than a nudge from the regulator, says Alastair Chisholm, CIWEM policy... Read More >
- Partnership approach to SuDS pays off for Northumbrian Water An integrated, partnership approach to sustainable drainage, which sees Northumbrian Water work closely with local... Read More >
- Digging Deeper: Property level flood protection A whole catchment approach to flood risk should include protection at the level of the individual property, writes... Read More >
- Tyre microplastics pollution: Ignore it or remove it? Tyre microplastics is one of the largest sources of pervasive pollution in the water environment, yet consistently ignored... Read More >
- Meeting the SuDS challenge A report indicates that the UK has a long way to go on implementing sustainable drainage systems, yet advice and... Read More >
- Capital's infrastructure needs integrated water approach The concerns of Londoners about the capital city's resilience highlight the need for integrated planning across water,... Read More >
- Ready for anything: Resilience in the Round Resilience is one of the four priorities that Ofwat wants to see water companies adopt in their plans for PR19. But what... Read More >
- Moving towards greener resilience Nature-based solutions can help us to see the big picture when building in system resilience, writes Dr Jonathan Simm,... Read More >