Totex incentives a must
Industry jargon always sends a shiver down my spine and this summer it will be the words 'Totex', 'Capex' and 'Opex' getting a full airing, as Ofwat consults widely on its plans to reform the way it sets prices and regulates the expenditure of the UK water companies.
Notwithstanding the ugliness of the terminology, Ofwat's intentions set out in its Future Price Limits consultation, and embodied in the recently-published Statement of Principles, are a thing of beauty to those of us in the industry supply chain. They signal real hope that we can contribute to greater engineering innovation and develop solutions that are based on achieving the best through-life costs for our customers. Now that has to be good news for sustainability, as well as for consumers.
Ofwat has signalled its determination to tackle what it calls the 'unintended bias' of the current regulatory system towards capital expenditure amongst the water companies. As part of its far-reaching reforms for PR14, it wants to combine the assessment and incentivisation of Opex (operating costs) and Capex (capital expenditure) into a more holistic Totex (total expenditure) approach.
At the same time, Ofwat wants to move towards a system which rewards the best outcomes, rather than the outputs that can be achieved if companies play the regulatory game well.
Whilst widely welcomed by the supply chain, the Totex proposals received a lukewarm reception from water companies themselves and Ofwat has indicated it will conduct consultations, workshops and working groups over the summer before launching a Methodology Consultation in the autumn.
Working out robust mechanisms is essential, but once they are in place the same thinking will need to be applied to the way water companies let contracts to their suppliers.
Speaking from the supply chain perspective, I think this looks like another major challenge: it will mean water companies potentially letting contracts on the basis of cheaper operating and through-life costs, even when initial set-up costs appear uncompetitive.
It will simply go against the grain to let a contract to the supplier that is not the cheapest. Water companies will need to be open-minded and creative in developing the necessary scrutiny and assessment criteria for bids, as well as providing robust incentives for suppliers to deliver operating efficiencies long after they have left site.
I don't believe these challenges are insurmountable, but as debates continue this summer over the regulatory framework itself, they should not be overlooked. We should begin to get the best contracting minds to work developing ideas for the exciting future ahead.
- Thames faces £100m penalty over customer service Ofwat has told Thames Water to return £100 million to customers as a result of its poor performance on customer... Read More >
- Yorkshire Water awards £1bn civils framework Yorkshire Water has awarded a £1 billion civils framework for 2020-2025, covering the full range of civil engineering... Read More >
- United Utilities unveils suppliers for Innovation Lab 2019 United Utilities has announced the eight tech companies that will join its second Innovation Lab. Read More >
- Better to be safe than sorry? 25/03/2013 11:01:52 "If it ain't broke - don't fix it:"So the truism goes. Why spend time and money monitoring and maintaining equipment or...
- Heavy Rainfall and Water Quality 03/01/2013 15:26:53 As we count the costs of last year's floods misery and find the best candidates for an extra £120m in flood defences,...
- Tackling Boom and Bust - We've only Just Begun 23/10/2012 15:02:20 Infrastructure UK's widely-welcomed report 'Smoothing Investment Cycles in the Water Sector' has emphatically confirmed that...
- Drought and Deluge - two sides of the same coin 11/09/2012 12:35:51 After the summer we've had, there's no denying how short our collective memories are when it comes to the weather. The...
- Sludge dirty secret or black gold? 06/05/2012 14:05:00 Culturally, the notion of sewage sludge has connotations of a dirty secret, rather than a valuable commodity. Even the name...