Tackling Boom and Bust - We've only Just Begun
Infrastructure UK's widely-welcomed report 'Smoothing Investment Cycles in the Water Sector' has emphatically confirmed that 'boom and bust' spending is having a real and damaging impact on our industry - and the consumers we serve.
Cyclicality adds an extra £5 to £6.50 to customers’ annual bills, as well as costing the industry up to £1.1 billion every AMP cycle, says the Government report which has been applauded by many leading industry and engineering groups.
The report’s conclusions follow the excellent representations made by groups including British Water that have clearly evidenced the cycle’s ‘hire and fire’ impact on supply chain employment levels.
The report acknowledges that the situation is not improving. So far attempts to mitigate its effects have had little success. There is now wholehearted acceptance of the problem from all parts of the industry and OFWAT, but finding solutions that can bring about real change will be another matter.
The report suggests that there is no ‘simple, single cause’ for the investment patterns that have emerged since privatisation and no one part of the industry is to blame. Instead, it says the cyclical effect has become ‘cultural’ and the industry needs to make a conscious effort to challenge ‘learnt behavior’.
Isn’t there an ‘elephant in the room’ here - that the simple, single cause of the problem is the regulatory structure itself? Admittedly, all suggested solutions to change the structure by staggering AMP cycles in some way have failed to convince regulators and investors that they are worth the risk. Longer price control periods of up to eight years may be considered before AMP7 begins in 2020.
For now the Government is pinning its hopes on better planning to smooth out the peaks and troughs, including introducing transition funding arrangements. It is challenging the industry to improve collaborative working and communication and to introduce more imaginative contractual structures.
After such a positive acknowledgement of the problem, it would be churlish of me to be defeatist, but I have to confess to being concerned that these recommendations will at best only smooth out the rougher edges of the problem.
Ofwat will consider the recommendations as part of its Future Price Limits consultation this autumn and I look forward to the British Water conference on the Report to be held on November 15.
- Southern Water reveals DWI investigation over historic performance Southern Water has said it faces an ongoing investigation from the Drinking Water Inspectorate in addition to the... Read More >
- More planning applications held up by SuDS in England than Wales Planning applications are twice as likely to be blocked or delayed due to sustainable drainage system (SuDS) design in... Read More >
- Yorkshire Water CEO Flint to retire Yorkshire Water has announced that Richard Flint is to retire as chief executive with effect from September 12 and will be... Read More >
- Better to be safe than sorry? 25/03/2013 11:01:52 "If it ain't broke - don't fix it:"So the truism goes. Why spend time and money monitoring and maintaining equipment or...
- Heavy Rainfall and Water Quality 03/01/2013 15:26:53 As we count the costs of last year's floods misery and find the best candidates for an extra £120m in flood defences,...
- Drought and Deluge - two sides of the same coin 11/09/2012 12:35:51 After the summer we've had, there's no denying how short our collective memories are when it comes to the weather. The...
- Totex incentives a must 11/07/2012 15:34:04 Industry jargon always sends a shiver down my spine and this summer it will be the words 'Totex', 'Capex' and 'Opex' getting...
- Sludge dirty secret or black gold? 06/05/2012 14:05:00 Culturally, the notion of sewage sludge has connotations of a dirty secret, rather than a valuable commodity. Even the name...