Idom Merebrook Ltd
Idom Merebrook has built up its considerable reputation for cutting edge environmental strategies over the past decade. We now employ a staff of over 90 Scientists, Engineers, Consultants and Technical Administrators who are dedicated to providing our customers with the best information and solutions available. The services listed below are a few of the areas in which we excel but are by no means exhaustive please click the link above to visit our website for further information. Our key services include: Contamination Risk assessment; Hazardous gas investigation; Site investigation, Site remediation design; Project management and budget control; Noise and vibration monitoring; Air quality studies; Environmental impact assessment; Waste management, Licensing and exemption application; Landfill tax exemption; Planning supervision and other CDM services; Health & Safety consultancy; Occupational hygiene; Organisational safety management; Asbestos surveys and training; Hazardous materials surveying; Road and drainage design; Earthworks design; Civil engineering project management; Flood risk assessment; Structural design (Bridges, Buildings and other Civil structures).
Mr Simon Edwards
East Mill Bridgefoot
New 2014 DEFRA Soil Screening Levels - Clean or not?
2014 has seen the publication by DEFRA of the new and long-awaited 'Category 4 screening levels' (C4SLs) for soil contamination. However, whilst the majority of contaminated land is remediated through development, the new C4SL have been derived to demonstrate that land is not contaminated.
It was DEFRA's intention that the C4SLs could be of use in the planning regime. However, policy responsibility for the National Planning Policy Framework falls to the Department for Communities and Local Government and DCLG have not made the role of C4SLs clear. As a result, there is uncertainty in the industry as to the status of the C4SLs in the planning regime.
The Good News and the Bad - benzo(a)pyrene and lead
The new C4SLs are based on a slightly higher acceptable level of risk. Therefore, you would expect the C4SL screening levels to be generally higher than the old SGVs or GACs.
This is indeed the case for the widespread contaminant, benzo(a)pyrene, which is found on the majority of brownfield sites and is frequently the driver for remediation. Adoption of the new C4SL, which is five times higher than the previous standards, could potentially remove the requirement for remediation in a large number of residential developments.
For lead, however, the new C4SL is less than half of the previously accepted screening criterion. There is some scope to adjust the screening level on the basis of background lead in soils, and a clear understanding of how to apply the standard is necessary. It is, therefore, increasingly likely that lead will become the new driver for clean-up on many brownfield sites. It will also be interesting to see how regulators view sites that have previously been remediated to the old standards for lead, however, it is unlikely that it could be proven that these represent a significant risk or that further remediation is justified.
In the absence of a clear government steer on use of C4SLs in the planning regime, it will be necessary to test out Local Authorities' perceptions and requirements with respect to environmental risk. The planning regime requires that developers ensure a 'safe' development - but the question remains - how do you define 'safe'?
For further information please email Idom Merebrook Ltd