Scientists and engineers ‘unhappy with Brexit uncertainty'
Almost nine in ten scientists and engineers are dissatisfied with government preparations for life outside the European Union, a survey from trade union Prospect has revealed.
The survey, completed by 2,750 Prospect members, found that 69% of respondents agreed that uncertainty about the timing and impact of the Brexit process had impacted negatively on their organisation’s ability to fulfil ongoing functions and plan or undertake long-term projects.
The research was released to coincide with today’s launch of a booklet spelling out the implications of Brexit for funding, collaboration and skills in UK science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM), and reveals strong concerns about Brexit among STEM professionals.
More than six in ten (64%) said they feel less secure in their employment since the EU referendum, while less than one quarter (23%) are confident that their organisation has the staff and skills to inform and support government negotiations on Brexit and take on the new responsibilities that Brexit might bring.
Looking ahead, 77% of respondents see continued access to the single market as a priority. Eighty per cent prioritised freedom of movement and 90% wanted guaranteed rights for EU nationals to stay in the UK. More than one in ten (11%) said they were planning to leave the UK up to and after Brexit, while a further 22% of STEM professionals said they would consider leaving.
Mary Creagh MP, Chair of the Environmental Audit Committee said: “The UK gets much more out of EU research funding than it puts in. UK science has benefited from collaboration with European research partners.
“The Environmental Audit Committee, which I chair, found that this sharing of environmental knowledge has provided significant benefits to the UK environment over the last 40 years. We have called on the Government to replace EU funding for research after we leave, and give clear commitments about how UK scientists can continue to work with our international partners to tackle the great environmental problems of our age, which do not respect national borders.”
Prospect deputy general secretary Sue Ferns said: “Continued uncertainty for our science funding and collaboration is not neutral. It damages relationships day-by-day and brings a high emotional cost. The government must make tangible commitments to end uncertainty and set a positive path to future economic success.”
- Water companies back workforce renewal strategy Water companies have backed a new strategy to bring in 221,000 new recruits by 2027 in the utilities sector to help ensure... Read More >
- Defra consults on non-domestic retail exit plans Defra has gone out to consultation over government plans that will allow water companies in England to exit the... Read More >
- Future Water Association urges firms to back youth initiative The Future Water Association is urging the sector to get behind its campaign to get young people interested in the sector... Read More >
- Opinion: Why the EA needs to rethink its charges hike AD operators will have little time to adapt to the shock increase in charges proposed by the EA, writes Anaerobic... Read More >
- New Connections: will reforms help utilities serve developers better? Reforms to the way that water companies charge for new connections are the most visible element of a drive from Ofwat to... Read More >
- Comment: What could retail competition do for customers? Domestic retail competition could provide an opportunity to look again at how we determine the price of water to the... Read More >
- Comment: Sludge all set for reform The opening of the bioresources market presents water companies with an opportunity to do things differently, but what... Read More >
- Interview: Ben Jeffs, Chief Executive, MOSL “The whole industry has really mobilised around market opening, and the water companies deserve credit for that.” Read More >