Firm and farmer fined for waste illegally used as flood defence
Waste company TJ Cottis Transport, one of its directors and a tenant farmer involved in the illegal deposit of waste as a flood defence on protected land in an Essex village have been ordered to pay a total of £19,430.
Chelmsford Magistrates Court heard that 3,920 tonnes of inert waste were deposited on land at Little Hayes Farm, Stow Maries, breaching a waste exemption. The work was also carried out without a flood defence consent or permission from Natural England.
The area is within an environmentally sensitive area which benefits from protection as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), a Special Protection Area, a Special Area of Conservation and RAMSAR site.
The court was told that the site did not comply with the U1 exemption which only allows 1,000 tonnes of soil and stones to be used for construction purposes. Almost four times this amount was deposited onto the land between April 15 and May 8, 2015, before the activity was stopped by Natural England and the Environment Agency (EA).
On August 3, 2017, Simon Hollington pleaded guilty to knowingly causing the illegal deposit, and TJ Cottis Transport and Jedd Cottis (a director of the company) both pleaded guilty to depositing the waste without an environmental permit and failing to comply with duty of care requirements.
Miriam Tordoff, prosecuting for the EA, told the court the waste was deposited there in an attempt to strengthen the existing flood defence at this location. The material used was construction and demolition waste from development sites and TJ Cottis Transport’s own permitted waste treatment facility. The waste consisted of mainly soil and stones but also included concrete, brick, plastic, glass, wood and plasterboard. It was not suitable for the construction of flood defences.
Hollington employed TJ Cottis to deliver waste to land at Little Hayes Farm, Stow Maries. The company paid Hollington £4,800 to deposit the waste. The company accepted that it saved £24,000 in landfill charges by depositing the waste on Hollington’s land.
Tordoff explained that following the EA’s request to remove the waste Hollington had now applied for an environmental permit to do this. The waste is expected to be removed later this year.
- Ofwat rules against Southern Water in connection dispute Ofwat has ruled against Southern Water in a dispute with a customer about the reasonableness of connection costs to a... Read More >
- Walthamstow development gets SUDs solution A major East London housing development has benefited from a shallow stormwater management system from Polypipe capable of... Read More >
- Work on SWW's Mayflower WTW pipeline starts South West Water (SWW) has started work to lay the pipes needed to transfer treated drinking water from its new £60M... Read More >
- Interview: Lawrence Gosden, MD, Wastewater, Thames Water This month we talk to Lawrence Gosden, MD for wastewater at Thames Water, about building flood resilience in London and... Read More >
- Getting to Grips with… highway pollution Pollution from urban highways, trunk roads and motorways poses significant risks to the environment from toxic metals and... Read More >
- Rainwater spin-out companies offer innovative path Researchers from the University of Exeter's Centre for Water Systems are putting the latest rainwater harvesting and SuDS... Read More >
- Project Focus: Anglian Water uses mapping tool for retrofit SuDS As part of its plans to shape and develop its surface water management strategy, Anglian Water has been working with a... Read More >
- Digging Deeper: Making the case for resilience Building resilience requires water utilities to have a clear and systematic understanding of risk across their business,... Read More >