European Commission takes UK to court over failure to protect marine species
The European Commission is taking the UK to the Court of Justice of the EU for its failure to propose sites for the protection of the harbour porpoise, a marine mammal regularly found in UK waters.
EU legislation on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora requires member states to propose a list of sites for a number of designated species and their habitats, ensuring their protection from threats and to take measures to ensure their conservation.
Due to the unfavourable status of the harbour porpoises in the EU, 13 other member states have designated around 200 sites for its protection. However, the UK has so far formally proposed only one small site in Northern Ireland (the Skerries and Causeway Special Area of Conservation) and one site in Scotland (the Inner Hebrides and Minches Special Area of Conservation).
The Commission says that since the UK has an extensive marine area, it has a particular responsibility for the protection of this species, and has repeatedly urged the British authorities to fulfil their obligations for the conservation of the species.
The action follows a letter of formal notice sent to the UK government in June 2013 and another in October 2014.
The UK has recently conducted a public consultation on a number of potential sites in English and Welsh waters and in September formally proposed one site in Scottish waters. However, many areas where the species occurs in greatest densities are lacking the protection required from potentially damaging activities such as offshore wind farm construction, oil and gas exploration and fishing.
- Wastewater treatment process blamed for 'inky' water at Niagara Falls A routine and necessary change in a nearby wastewater treatment works process has been blamed for the presence of "inky... Read More >
- Yorkshire Water to plant 63,000 trees in restored woodland A 14-year project to restore Yorkshire's ancient woodland back to its original state has reached its second phase with... Read More >
- Report reveals 'yawning gap' over the water firms' environmental plans The water companies' environmental plans reveal "a yawning gap" between the best and worst performers in England... Read More >
- Opinion: Why the EA needs to rethink its charges hike AD operators will have little time to adapt to the shock increase in charges proposed by the EA, writes Anaerobic... Read More >
- New Connections: will reforms help utilities serve developers better? Reforms to the way that water companies charge for new connections are the most visible element of a drive from Ofwat to... Read More >
- Comment: What could retail competition do for customers? Domestic retail competition could provide an opportunity to look again at how we determine the price of water to the... Read More >
- Comment: Sludge all set for reform The opening of the bioresources market presents water companies with an opportunity to do things differently, but what... Read More >
- Interview: Ben Jeffs, Chief Executive, MOSL “The whole industry has really mobilised around market opening, and the water companies deserve credit for that.” Read More >