Catchment management held back by governance question
The benefits of catchment management are clear but governance is one of the key barriers to be overcome before it can be implemented effectively across the country, delegates at Utility Week Live heard.
Independent consultant David Baxter, formerly of the Environment Agency, told the audience in the conference’s water theatre that £100BN of spending was needed over 15 years to comply with the Water Framework Directive. Catchment-based solutions make sense for water companies as they can play a crucial part in meeting customer outcomes and embody a Totex-friendly approach.
However, Baxter added: “Strategic solutions might in theory be fairly obvious, but they don’t always get done. Saying catchment management is the answer is like saying that the key to good health is losing weight and giving up smoking. It sounds simple but there is much more to it than that. Sometimes it needs a crisis to trigger change. A crisis is not yet upon us, but it might not be far away.”
He said that governance was one of the key barriers to catchment management. Water companies often feel they need extra reward to take a lead on catchment solutions because of the extra risk involved, yet struggle to win extra funding from Ofwat. Furthermore it is not always clear who should pay for catchment-based initiatives; money spent from different sources is not properly co-ordinated; and it is difficult to measure the direct benefits of any particular expenditure.
He said one answer could be the model used in Holland, where ‘water boards’ are formed of all stakeholders with an interest in the catchment. Decisions on action and expenditure to tackle pollution are shared, with the proportion of power an organisation holds depending on the level of its interest in the catchment.
Susan Davy, Group Finance Director at Pennon Group, the owner of South West Water, told delegates that the utility’s AMP5 work included £10.8M of work on third party land, with interventions including blocking up troublesome drainage ditches on Exmoor, fencing to prevent animals straying into watercourses, and grants to farmers to improve existing assets. She said that it made financial sense for the water customer to foot this bill because of the cost this avoided elsewhere. “Either we have early intervention in the catchment or we end up investing in assets downstream to cope with it. By having these interventions customers end up paying less,” she said.
Wessex Water has also been active in this field, and David Elliott, Director of Strategy and New Markets, said that its catchment work to reduce nitrogen and nitrates over AMP4 and AMP5 had obviated the need for £80M in capital expenditure. However he said that the next level for catchment management was to create a fully functioning “nutrient market” where such expenditure and benefits are traded, and that it did not make sense for water companies to take a “sole agency approach” on this.
“Who is the system operator – who is making the ‘make or buy’ decisions?” said Elliott. “Currently it’s the water company but should they be responsible for all of these decisions? I’m not so sure.”
The question of who pays for catchment interventions should not be an insurmountable stumbling block, because ultimately the end consumer would need to pay, whether it was through their taxation, food bills or water bills, he added.
- ICE calls for totex approaches to be incentivised Totex approaches and the use of soft engineering, such as catchment management, should be fully incentivised through the... Read More >
- SE Water targets metaldehyde in River Ouse catchment plan A scheme to improve the quality of the water in the River Ouse has been officially launched in a partnership between South... Read More >
- Wessex Water to trial catchment-wide permits to cut costs Wessex Water has signed an agreement with the Environment Agency (EA) to trial an industry-first catchment-wide permitting... Read More >
- Thinking outside the box on alternative water Water companies' response to a short-term supply disruption is often to distribute bottled water, but Thames Water is now... Read More >
- Rainwater spin-out companies offer innovative path Researchers from the University of Exeter's Centre for Water Systems are putting the latest rainwater harvesting and SuDS... Read More >
- Comment: Preparing for extreme weather events The challenge of climate change resilience means that the conventional deterministic approach to drought planning is no... Read More >
- Interview: Jean Spencer, Anglian Water director, on drought resilience In this WWT profile interview Jean Spencer, Director of Strategic Growth and Resilience at Anglian Water, talks about the... Read More >
- The universal challenge of water Water utilities across the world face many similar challenges despite their varying locations and economic conditions,... Read More >
- Head of Tendering & Design Salary Range: Commensurate with roleThe Tendering & Design Department plays a critical role in turning customer enquiries in to fully costed... Read more here.
- Head of Operations Salary Range: Commensurate with role Head of Operations: The Head of Operations will be responsible for the successful day to day delivery... Read more here.
- Deputy Directors – multiple roles The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) is the independent economic and safety regulator for Britain’s railways, overseeing an industry that carried... Read more here.